What happens to the Pokemon no one takes?

This..

http://www.dorkly.com/video/13119/dorkly-bits-the-horrible-secret-behind-starter-pokemon

Actually, the 4th and 5th gen starters are completely safe. All three get chosen nowadays.

No self-respecting individual would choose Chikorita...

Bulbasaur seems like a God next to everyone else there... which he is of course. Bulbasaur is the king yo! I've grown to appreciate him as ive aged.

Even if you catch them all, wouldn't it be impossible to save all of the starters? Every game has one is destined to die (In the past games).

In my opinion mudkip's evolution made it the most useful starter in 3 gen and since everyone chose squirtle in red that makes charmander the left out one
I refuse for starter discrimination of the ones I like continue

Charmander had Charizard, which made people choose him.
It was mostly Bulbasaur who was left out.

Well, I, for one, always chose Bulbasaur. Except when I chose Charmander. But I never liked Squirtle (in the games).

Here is how I see it. Charmander is for the kids, Bulbasuar is for the Pros, and Squirtle is fo da turtles.

You got it completely reveresed...
Bulbasaur is for the non pros, because it's strong against the first three gyms.
Charmander is for pros, because it sucks against the first two.

Meaning that a trainer with extra-sufficient skill is required to wield a Charmander.

I was kidding but squirtle kicks brocks gym when you have little else to fight with and he can take on the last two gyms by himself making him the most balanced of the starters.
I refuse for starter discrimination of the ones I like continue

THAT BLUE OTTER THING FREKIN SUCKS!